Precedent corpus / CNIL (France)
Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés
CNIL (France) case DELIB-2020-092, decided . No monetary penalty.
We have not checked whether this decision was appealed. This is not a statement that no appeal exists.
Regulator guidance (positive exemplar)
What the regulator decided
The controller must offer users the option to accept and to refuse read/write operations on their terminal with the same degree of simplicity (Article 2.4, "Modalités du refus"); withdrawing consent must be as easy as giving it, and the means of withdrawal must be signposted before consent is collected (Article 3, "Retrait et gestion du consentement").
Primary source
Regulator-owned URL. Quote this in legal briefs and academic citations.
https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/cnil/id/CNILTEXT000042398022Archived snapshot
Wayback Machine snapshot of the primary source. Use this when the regulator URL might be refactored or expire.
https://web.archive.org/web/20231202122010/https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/cnil/id/CNILTEXT000042398022/ConsentMark interpretation
Operator-readable note on how this case shapes the ConsentMark scanner narrative. Not a legal opinion; cites the primary source.
Non-enforcement recommendation. CNIL's own description of a compliant cookie banner (symmetric accept/refuse, easy withdrawal, granular per-purpose consent). Original in French; `finding` paraphrases Article 2.4 + Article 3 in English. Companion binding text: Délibération 2020-091 (lignes directrices).
Verification trail
Checked against the primary source on 27th August 2026. Next review 27th February 2027.
Cite this case
@misc{consentmark-precedent-cnil-delib-2020-092,
author = {{ConsentMark}},
year = {2020},
title = {CNIL (France) DELIB-2020-092 - Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés},
howpublished = {\url{https://www.consentmark.com/precedent/cnil-delib-2020-092}},
note = {ConsentMark methodology v7.8.1}
}ConsentMark. (2020, September 17). CNIL (France) DELIB-2020-092 - Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés. Methodology v7.8.1. https://www.consentmark.com/precedent/cnil-delib-2020-092[CNIL (France) DELIB-2020-092 - Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés - ConsentMark](https://www.consentmark.com/precedent/cnil-delib-2020-092)CNIL (France) DELIB-2020-092 - Commission Nationale de l'Informatique et des Libertés - ConsentMark, 2020-09-17, methodology v7.8.1, https://www.consentmark.com/precedent/cnil-delib-2020-092